GASP: AICF

Search controls

Search by control ID, name or domain

INC-003 Incident Classification and Escalation

Tier 2+

Description

Incidents are classified by severity and type using a defined taxonomy. Classification determines escalation paths, notification requirements, and response SLAs. Criteria for classifying an event as a data breach or high-severity incident are documented and consistently applied.

Rationale

Consistent classification ensures the right people are notified at the right speed. Misclassification — particularly under-classification — is a major cause of delayed response and regulatory exposure.

Framework Mappings (3)

SEF-07Incident Management and Responsepartial
IR-4Incident Handlingpartial
IR-6Incident Reportingpartial

Evidence (2)

policymanual

Incident classification policy defining the severity taxonomy, classification criteria, escalation triggers, and response SLAs for each severity level.

Example: Incident Classification Matrix or IRP appendix (version-controlled) defining severity levels (e.g., P1–P4), classification criteria, data breach determination criteria, escalation requirements, and response SLA per level

Test: Request the incident classification policy or matrix. Verify: (1) severity levels are defined with explicit criteria; (2) data breach classification criteria are documented and consistent with GDPR Art.33 triggers; (3) each severity level has a defined escalation path and response SLA; (4) the matrix is referenced in the IRP and training materials.

recordmanual

Sample incident records showing consistent application of the classification taxonomy including severity assignment and escalation decisions.

Example: Incident records from the past 12 months (at least 5 incidents across severity levels) showing event type, initial classification, escalation actions taken, and any reclassification with rationale

Test: Request a sample of incident records from the last 12 months spanning multiple severity levels. Verify: (1) each incident record shows a severity classification; (2) classification is consistent with the documented criteria; (3) escalation actions match the requirements for the assigned severity level; (4) any reclassifications are documented with a rationale.

Questions (2)

boolean

Are incidents classified by severity and type using a defined taxonomy, with classification criteria documented and consistently applied to determine escalation paths, notification requirements, and response SLAs?

The classification matrix should explicitly include criteria for identifying a personal data breach (triggering GDPR notification obligations) and should be referenced in all incident triage processes.

select

How many severity levels are defined in your incident classification taxonomy?

4 or more levels (e.g. P1 Critical / P2 High / P3 Medium / P4 Low) with distinct criteria and SLAs for each3 levels (e.g. High / Medium / Low) with distinct criteria and SLAs2 levels (e.g. Major / Minor)No defined severity taxonomy — incidents are assessed on a case-by-case basis

Four distinct severity levels with explicit classification criteria and SLAs per level is the expected standard for enterprise SaaS providers. Fewer levels reduce classification precision.